EMRFD Message Archive 9419

Message Date From Subject
9419 2013-11-25 18:54:20 Phil Sittner NE602--Antenna analyzer
Gentlemen-
 
PA1ARE (SK) designed an interesting antenna analyzer using two oscillators; a 48mhz crystal and a 49-78mhz PLL. A pair of NE602's are used as mixers generating the difference, 1-30mhz. One mixer is fed at -45 deg from the xtal source, the other at +45 deg. A third NE602 is used as an IQ detector for phase measurement.
 
Am I correct in thinking that if a NE602 is fed with identical inputs, 180 degrees apart, the output will be a DC signal? I ask this question because my ugly constructed analyzer is behaving strangely, and I need a better understanding to fix whatever error I may have made.
 
It should also be mentioned that this design is brilliant, at least to me.
 
Phil
kd6rm
9420 2013-11-25 20:13:46 William Carver Re: NE602--Antenna analyzer
In concept in phase: sin(wt)*sin(wt) = 1/2 + sin(2wt)/2.
180 degrees phase: sin(wt)*(-sin(wt)) = -1/2 - sin(2wt)/2

So 180 degree changes the sign of the Dc component and the
double-frequency component is 180 degrees out of phase.

W7AAZ



On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 18:54 -0800, Phil Sittner wrote:
>
> Gentlemen-
>
> PA1ARE (SK) designed an interesting antenna analyzer using two
> oscillators; a 48mhz crystal and a 49-78mhz PLL. A pair of NE602's are
> used as mixers generating the difference, 1-30mhz. One mixer is fed at
> -45 deg from the xtal source, the other at +45 deg. A third NE602 is
> used as an IQ detector for phase measurement.
>
> Am I correct in thinking that if a NE602 is fed with identical inputs,
> 180 degrees apart, the output will be a DC signal? I ask this question
> because my ugly constructed analyzer is behaving strangely, and I need
> a better understanding to fix whatever error I may have made.
>
> It should also be mentioned that this design is brilliant, at least to
> me.
>
> Phil
> kd6rm
>
9421 2013-11-26 07:21:28 Dave Hartman Re: NE602--Antenna analyzer
Where could I find the details for the NE602 antenna analyzer?
Dave - AC2GL
9422 2013-11-26 08:31:26 Ravi Miranda Re: NE602--Antenna analyzer


On 26 November 2013 15:21, Dave Hartman <ac2gl@aol.com> wrote:
 

Where could I find the details for the NE602 antenna analyzer?
Dave - AC2GL




--
I'm here to add more value to the world than I'm using up.
9424 2013-11-26 10:47:21 William Carver Re: NE602--Antenna analyzer
VERY NICE, VERY WELL DONE!
W7AAZ


On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 16:31 +0000, Ravi Miranda wrote:
>
> http://homepages.ipact.nl/~pa1are/analyzer_eng/Antenna_Analyzer.html
>
>
> On 26 November 2013 15:21, Dave Hartman <ac2gl@aol.com> wrote:
>
> Where could I find the details for the NE602 antenna analyzer?
> Dave - AC2GL
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> I'm here to add more value to the world than I'm using up.
>
9425 2013-11-26 10:48:41 AD7ZU Re: NE602--Antenna analyzer

Bill is correct .. and to expand a bit..
 
Any mixer will produce a DC output if both inputs are the same frequency.  That is the basis for phase locked loop circuits, the phase detector is actually a mixer.  There is an interesting example in EMRFD (4.7) that illustrates a diode ring producing a DC output proportional to the phase difference between two inputs.  The DC signal is 0 when the inputs are 90 degrees apart.
 
 
Randy
AD7ZU

9426 2013-11-26 12:12:27 Lasse Moell Re: NE602--Antenna analyzer
It gets even better.... if you go up to the root http://homepages.ipact.nl/~pa1are/
and click on analyzer you will see the V2 and all software/firmware.

Really really nice

/Lasse SM5GLC

Tue Nov 26 2013 19:47:19 GMT+0100, William Carver skrev:

 

VERY NICE, VERY WELL DONE!
W7AAZ

On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 16:31 +0000, Ravi Miranda wrote:
>
> http://homepages.ipact.nl/~pa1are/analyzer_eng/Antenna_Analyzer.html
>
>
> On 26 November 2013 15:21, Dave Hartman wrote:
>
> Where could I find the details for the NE602 antenna analyzer?
> Dave - AC2GL
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> I'm here to add more value to the world than I'm using up.
>

9430 2013-11-26 17:20:45 Phil Sittner Re: NE602--Antenna analyzer

William-
 
Thanks for your prompt response and the equations. But I need some translation since my trig skills are lacking.
 
-If you input the same frequency with each input 180 degrees apart the output should be zero, no DC component no AC component? Or is there an output proportional to the difference in amplitudes?
 
-If you input the same frequency with a phase difference that differs from 180 degrees what should one expect as an output?
 
Phil
kd6rm
 
 
----- Original Message -----
9431 2013-11-26 17:29:04 Phil Sittner Re: NE602--Antenna analyzer

Thanks Randy. My math skills are a little short and your explanati
9432 2013-11-26 18:02:06 William Carver Re: NE602--Antenna analyzer
On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 17:20 -0800, Phil Sittner wrote:
>
> 
>
> William-
>
> Thanks for your prompt response and the equations. But I need some
> translation since my trig skills are lacking.
>
> -If you input the same frequency with each input 180 degrees apart the
> output should be zero, no DC component no AC component? Or is there an
> output proportional to the difference in amplitudes?
>
> -If you input the same frequency with a phase difference that differs
> from 180 degrees what should one expect as an output?
>
> Phil
> kd6rm

The equations are just the equality for sin-squared, which the NE602
produces if its two inputs are not overdriven. The actual output voltage
depends upon the circuit, and is proportion to the two input amplitudes.

IF you could run it at 1 volt, the output from two 1 volt sinusoids
(same frequency, zero phase between them) is 1/2 volt DC plus 1/2 volt
of sinusoid at double the frequency (the NE602 makes a pretty clean
frequency doubler, as well as using the 1/2 volt DC as a phase detector.

The DC component drops as the phase between the two sinusoids departs
from zero. At ninety degrees the DC drops to zero. Then it starts rising
again, BUT NEGATIVE, peaking at 1/2 volt at 180 degrees. It decreases
again to zero volts at 270 degrees (which is the same as -90 degrees),
then rises back to +1/2 volt as we come full circuit back to 360 degrees
= 0 degrees.

Now actually the NE602 inputs are limited to less than one volt, at
about 1/2 volt peak it starts becoming nonlinear I think (it's been a
long time since I used one, someone can give the exact amplitude limits
for linear operati
9433 2013-11-26 18:20:08 William Carver Re: NE602--Antenna analyzer
On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 17:20 -0800, Phil Sittner wrote:
>
> 
>
> William-
>
> Thanks for your prompt response and the equations. But I need some
> translation since my trig skills are lacking.
>
> -If you input the same frequency with each input 180 degrees apart the
> output should be zero, no DC component no AC component? Or is there an
> output proportional to the difference in amplitudes?

Sorry, should have emphasized that the NE602 is an analog MULTIPLIER. As
long as you don't overload the inputs the output is proportional to the
PRODUCT of the two input signalss. The output amplitude will be
proporti
9434 2013-11-26 18:59:44 Phil Sittner Re: NE602--Antenna analyzer

Bill-
 
Thank you very much. This circuit is very intriguing so I'm digging deeply into it.
 
Phil
----- Original Message -----
9435 2013-11-26 19:05:01 AD7ZU Re: NE602--Antenna analyzer

The NE602 and derivatives use a gilbert cell as the mixer portion of the chip.   There are a host of applications today that still rely on analog multiplication …mixing rf signals to another frequency is but one such application. 
 
It is interesting that before the digital days the gilbert cell was designed as an analog multiplier. 
Some of us ancient folk may still remember wiring up analog computing problems on those peg boards in college.. the multiplier was one of the little plug in blocks…and inside was a gilbert cell.
 
 
9436 2013-11-26 19:22:39 William Carver Re: NE602--Antenna analyzer
Yes Phil, its a very nicely done instrument, suited very well to antenna
work. After Thanksgiving I'll consider how I might build one myself.

W7AAZ

On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 18:59 -0800, Phil Sittner wrote:
>
> 
>
> Bill-
>
> Thank you very much. This circuit is very intriguing so I'm digging
> deeply into it.
>
> Phil
> ----- Original Message -----
>
9437 2013-11-26 20:09:16 Phil Sittner Re: NE602--Antenna analyzer

William-
 
In researching antenna analyzer designs I happened across Arend's (PA1ARE) site. It was only after starting the build on his design that it was discovered that he became a silent key just a year after he posted it. His club has apparently kept the site up as a memorial to the man. There's some additional bio about him; he died at age 50 from a blood disorder, had worked in the fiber optics industry doing design work and was last employed as a hardware engineer at Delft University. He also had a major interest in solar physics. He sounds like a person I would like to have know.
 
My best wishes to you and your family for a happy Thanksgiving, and again thank you for taking the time to help me understand the operation of these circuits. Good luck with your build.
 
Phil
kd6rm
----- Original Message -----
9438 2013-11-27 02:25:34 Russell Shaw Re: NE602--Antenna analyzer
9439 2013-11-27 16:21:33 Phil Sittner Re: NE602--Antenna analyzer

Russell-
 
Talk about an authority,what great credentials. Thank you and everyone else who has taken the time to help me understand the dynamics at play here. As mentioned earlier, this design is quite wonderful and I need to finish the fabrication and try it.
 
Phil
----- Original Message -----
9440 2013-11-27 16:28:08 Phil Sittner Re: NE602--Antenna analyzer

William-
 
There's a couple of hard to find parts for this. Both the loop controller chip, MC145170, and the varactor, BB212, were found on ebay; the first came from Silicon Valley and the second from China. Hard to believe that stuff that was designed in Europe needs to be sourced from China. Happy Thanksgiving and again thanks for your interest and support.
 
Phil
kd6rm
----- Original Message -----
9441 2013-11-27 16:30:07 Dana Myers Re: NE602--Antenna analyzer
9445 2013-11-29 06:11:43 Eamon Egan Re: NE602--Antenna analyzer

Hi Phil.

When looking at an analog multiplier, it's the cosine of the phase angle between the signals that determines the average (i.e. lowpassed) version of the output signal. Thus:

0 degrees = +1
+/- 90 degrees = 0
180 degrees = -1

This is the phase angle coefficient. Obviously the output is also proportional to the input signal levels and the conversion gain.

I hope this helps (and that I'm not repeating what someone else said - I haven't been following the thread very carefully).

73
Eamon
VE2EGN or AB1NK


9447 2013-11-29 07:38:39 Phil Sittner Re: NE602--Antenna analyzer
Eamon-
 
Thank you helping work my way through this. The EMRFD group has a number of helpful members and is a great resource.Please accept my wishes for a happy holiday season.
 
Phil
----- Original Message -----
9449 2013-11-29 16:34:59 Ravi Miranda Re: NE602--Antenna analyzer
Hello

Would MC145170 be a stumbling block? What if we could use another PLL such as the LMXnnnn series? and a Microchip PIC? That of course would mean redevelopment of the code, assuming of course that we could understand the computation required.

Is this achievable and what steps would we need to take? for example is the math like this here? http://www.users.on.net/~endsodds/maths.jpg


73
2E0RVI /Ravi


On 29 November 2013 15:38, Phil Sittner <sittners@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
 

Eamon-
 
Thank you helping work my way through this. The EMRFD group has a number of helpful members and is a great resource.Please accept my wishes for a happy holiday season.
 
Phil
----- Original Message -----
9450 2013-11-29 17:21:36 ford@highmarks.co... Re: NE602--Antenna analyzer

To answer your question re:stumbling block, a resounding “yes.”

 

I used the MC145170 almost 20 years ago as a frequency setting clock in a 900MHz frequency hopper.  It has not been in production use for about that long.  There is almost no use for them in modern equipment, which is why they are no longer in production.  The legacy units will work.  But why?  The collectors are holding new markets hostage for big dough and using them for new designs makes no sense to me.

 

I don’t like the notion of using a PIC but that is a personal preference. 

 

The …170 was magic back in its day.  Designed for typical ‘channel’ applications of 5KHz spacing, it was exceptionally easy to program and use.  I never pushed it past 120MHz, but the spec says it will go higher—160MHz comes to mind. 

 

Unless the code is exceptionally easy to re-use intact, the effort to going to a more modern device would be important to any update of those ancient designs.  The LMX series would be a good candidate, but why?  Why not use a DDS instead?  Many of the LMX were also integer units and a modern device can likely go down to sub Hz resolution for applications that may prove useful at that resolution (like crystal filters) and have a lower noise floor.

 

Ford-N0FP

 

 

 

 

9451 2013-11-29 17:30:21 Ashhar Farhan Re: NE602--Antenna analyzer
Ford,

There are alternative sources for MC145170. I bought 10 of them for less than $3 each at the last hamfest. Here is the link http://homebrewcorner.blogspot.in/p/rf-components-stock-as-on-oct-2012.html. Scroll down and find them. I suppose he can ship them to the USA in an envelope.

- farhan
9453 2013-11-29 18:12:16 ford@highmarks.co... Re: NE602--Antenna analyzer

Legacy devices no longer supported by Freescale.  What I didn’t realize is that Lansdale seems to have picked them up and are now calling it an ML145170 back in 2006.

 

http://www.lansdale.com/datasheets/ML145170.pdf

 

So perhaps my concerns are minimized.  But before I invested in time and materials to build something other than a one-up design, I’d check to see that there was some availability beyond eBay.  Given that the market has disappeared for channelized devices, a newer design may be the recommendation.  I haven’t heard of anybody doing a VHF cordless phone for 15 years or more.  Nobody would ever repair one, which is why these devices are now legacy.

 

With that being said, the magic of this CMOS design was that it used a 16 bit N register which could be programmed at the bit or byte level.  Two 8 bit word transfers did the trick.  The math is straight forward too.  It is an integer device—channelized—e.g. no fractional N available.  It also supported an internal oscillator.  I was never able to get it to QSY very fast.  But then, as an analyzer that may not be important.  Limiting it to 5KHz or 10KHz steps might be though.  I’ve used 160M short verticals where those steps were unreasonable because the 3:1 bandwidth was only 20KHz!

 

Similar PLL designs were also available in dual versions.

 

Ford-N0FP